Shakespeare and Modernism, a Symposium
A Symposium on Shakespeare and Modernism
30 April 2016, The Pit, Barbican Centre, London
Review by Xiaohui Guo, MA in Culture and Creative Industries
For a one-day tour to explore 20th century approaches to
Shakespeare, the Shakespeare and Modernism Symposium held
by Barbican Centre on 30th April was definitely a good
choice. Don’t be scared by the word symposium, it was not a
formal meeting as the name indicates. The symposium invited
three Shakespeare scholars and one Shakespeare scenic designer to each give a short talk. The audience was
mostly made up of Shakespeare enthusiasts, with of course
some readers who had a rich academic knowledge of
Shakespeare, which could be seen from the Q&A in the
end.
The modernism theme encouraged informal and enthusiastic
discussion, no matter the topic of the lectures or the
fullness of the schedule. I was very impressed by
the Coriolanus excerpt performed by
students from Queen Mary's University, when waiting in
the hall. The non-professional young actors, wearing casual
clothes and performing in the modernist hall of the art
centre, really captured the modernism of
Shakespeare.
The Symposium was primarily divided into two parts, two
lectures and two discussions. The first lecture was given
by Cary DiPietro, the author of Shakespeare and Modernism. In the one hour lecture, he weaved a history of
Shakespeare research, with the ideas of many brilliant writers and thinkers in
the 20th century. It is not surprising to hear many
familiar great names like Benjamin, T.S.Eliot, Sigmund Freud, James Joyce, Virginia Woolf, which persuades us that Shakespeare is everywhere in modernism. This section was much more academic, looking at the
role that different art forms and school of thoughts play
in the study of Shakespeare.
Modernism can be
simplified as making the Shakespeare play new, breaking
with past, such as using the language in an entirely new
fashion, or as T.S. Eliot did, reinterpreting Shakespeare
to create new art. Many interesting examples were given,
like the combining of Twelfth Night and cubism, Macbeth and engraving. Among them, the most impressed examples
were Sigmund Freud’s character criticism of Hamlet, using the unconscious concept, as well as the Virginia
Woolf ’s gender perspective, asking what would have happened if
Shakespeare had been a woman.
The next part was more visual, focusing on scenography.
It was great to hear a real scenic designer share his real
experience and thoughts. The speaker, Stephen Brimson Lewis, won an Olivier Award for his set, and was nominated for a Tony Award and Drama Desk Award for ‘Best Scenic Design’ and ‘Best Costume Design’ for the play Indiscretions on Broadway. He discussed with Shakespeare scholar Bridget Escolme, about the balance of practicality and artificiality, the relationship between play and audience, digital technology, from a perspective of practical
work. Christian Billing, who is senior lecturer in Drama and Theatre Practice at the University of
Hull, gave another lecture on Czechoslovak Scenography from 1918-1968, providing the audience with massive amounts of scenic
design drafts of great designers, like Josef Wenig, Vlastislav Hofman, Josef Capek and Josef Svoboda.